23 mars 2010

Rockström strikes back


Snowroller tipsade om Johan Rockströms senaste debattartikel i Aftonbladet. Samma gamla smörja som vi hört till leda de senaste åren.

"Det är svårförståeligt varför skeptiker så hårdnackat vill hålla oss kvar i en fossil återvändsgränd, när vetenskap och förnuft pekar på behovet av en fundamental förändring mot en hållbar framtid."

Vetenskap och förnuft? Hahahahahahahaha!

Datormodeller och makthungriga människor snarare...

Som sagt, det är viktigt att paniken upprätthålls. Gud förbjude att någon skulle börja ifrågasätta Rockströms fabricerade klimathot för då skulle väl anslagen tas bort och karln bli utan jobb.



3 kommentarer:

Osynlige Mannen sa...

Ja, det finns en mycket stark korrelation mellan en människas åsikt och hur mycket samma människas försörjning beror på att uttrycka samma åsikt. Det känns liksom inte som att det behövs mer psykologisk eller sociologisk forskning på den punkten.

Anonym sa...

In defense of Freedom and Non-Junk Science, formerly "Science":

1. "1975 ´Endangered Atmosphere´Conference, Where the Global Warming Hoax Was Born," by Marjorie Mazel Hecht, Fall 2007, 21st CENTURY Science & Technology, at http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/GWHoaxBorn.pdf.

1.1 "The Global Warming Fraud," 21st CENTURY Science & Technology, at http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Global_Warming.html.

2. "Green Hell: How Enviromentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them," by Dr. Steven Milloy, Regnery Press, 2009.

2.1 http://www.junkscience.com/, http://greenhellblog.com/, and http://ultimateglobalwarmingchallenge.com/ are websites by Dr. Steven Milloy.

2.2 The American Conservative Union, Saturday, February 20, 2010, 3:30 PM, Mariott Ballroom, at http://www.cpac.org/agenda_20908.html:

"Saving Freedom from the Hoax of Global Warming":

-- Chris Horner, author of "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming."

-- Ann McElhinney, "Not Evil Just Wrong: The True Cost of Global Warming Hysteria."

-- Steve Milloy, JunkScience.com

-- Myron Ebell, Competitive Enterprise Institute.

3. "Climate Change Reconsidered: The Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC)," by Dr. Craig Idso, and Dr. S. Fred Singer, The Heartland Institute, 2009.

4. "Non-Aerospace Research Quests of a Designer/Flight Test Engineer, Things you probably do not know about Rutan," By Burt Rutan, Presented at the Oshkosh Convention on 7/29/09, and 8/1/09, at http://rps3.com/Files/AGW/Rutan.AGWdataAnalysis%20v11.pdf. (My remark: Also posted at the Watts Up With That? blog, as "Aviation pioneer and master engineer Burt Rutan on Global Warming," January 3, 2010.)

5. "A Report of The Heritage Center For Data Analysis, The Economic Consequences of Waxman-Markey: An Analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009," David W. Kreutzer, PH.D., Karen A. Campbell, PH.D., William Beach, Ben Lieberman, and Nicolas D. Loris, CDA09-04, August 6, 2009, at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2009/08/The-Economic-Consequences-of-Waxman-Markey-An-Analysis-of-the-American-Clean-Energy-and-Security-Act-of-2009.

6. "Global Warming Petition Project," 31,486 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs, at http://www.petitionproject.org/:

Petition

"We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth´s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth´s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the nattural plant and animal enviroment of the Earth."

Annika sa...

Här är en liten glad nyhet, det verkar som fransmännen har tagit ett förnuftigt beslut:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/7507015/France-ditches-carbon-tax-as-social-protests-mount.html
Man får glädja sig åt de små ljusglimtar man kan hitta i detta klimatvansinnesmörker...